Printable Version
Tell a friend
AFL-CIO TO SENATE: DON'T UNDERMINE HEALTH CARE
Friday, June 13, 2008
(PAI)AFL-CIO TO SENATE: DON’T UNDERMINE HEALTH
CARE
WASHINGTON (PAI)--Efforts to reform the
nation’s health care system should make it
universal, comprehensive and affordable without
undermining the better aspects of the present
employer-based health care system, the AFL-CIO
says.
Speaking for the federation in early June in
one of a series of Senate Finance Committee
hearings on the state of U.S. health care,
federation Executive Vice President Arlene
Holt-Baker reminded lawmakers the present
employer-based system covers the majority of
U.S.
residents.
And while she advocated the solution the
federation backs--a mixed private-public system
with government as the strong regulator of
private health care costs and the health
insurer for those who cannot get private
insurance--Hilt-Baker said the present system
should not be arbitrarily
junked.
“As we work toward lowering costs and
covering everyone, we must be sure reforms do
not undermine employer coverage, which is the
backbone of our health care system and covers
160 million Americans. That is because
employer-based coverage has significant
advantages,” Holt-Baker
said.
Holt-Baker spoke to the Finance panel, a key
player in writing health care legislation,
spoke just days before backers of fully
government-run universal health care took the
House floor for a late-night session on C-SPAN
advocating that plan. Their measure, HR
676, now has the support of more than 300
separate union organizations, with the latest
being the Michigan
AFL-CIO.
The committee will not tackle health care
legislation this year, but its hearings are
laying the groundwork by gathering
evidence--and opinions--in anticipation of
legislation next year to change the nation’s
creaky, expensive, insurer-run health care
system.
Holt-Baker also spoke as health care continues
to be a key topic on the presidential campaign
trail. There, prospective Democratic
nominee Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has proposed
universal care for kids, controlling costs,
using government leverage to cut premiums to
make coverage more affordable and available,
and having government be the insurer of last
resort.
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the prospective GOP
presidential nominee, would have individuals
venture into the insurance market to buy
coverage for themselves, armed with a $5,000
after-the-fact tax credit to cover premium
payments. He also would tax
employer-provided health insurance.
The AFL-CIO calls his plan a continuation of
anti-worker GOP President George W. Bush’s
“you’re on your own” health care
policies.
Holt-Baker laid out several advantages of the
present employer-based health care system:
“It provides a natural pooling mechanism and
has lower administrative costs when compared
with coverage in the individual market: 10% of
premiums for group coverage versus 25% to 40%
individual market
coverage.
“And because there is no individual
underwriting in employer plans, workers are not
excluded from coverage due to age or health
status and premiums are more in line with
actual medical expenditures than they are in
the individual market,” she
testified.
“Furthermore, both employees and employers
highly value employer-based coverage.
Surveys show workers value health benefits more
than any other non-wage benefit. Another
survey asked workers in employer plans if they
would prefer to continue receiving health
benefits through their job or receive an
increase in taxable income equal to the average
premium instead. Three quarters said they
would prefer to continue receiving employer
sponsored health
insurance.”
Holt-Baker admitted the present system has
flaws, notably increasing costs which eat into
or wipe out workers’ pay increases. She
told senators health care has been the #1 issue
in bargaining for the last several years, and
that many times workers sacrifice raises to
keep their health care cost increases
down.
Finance Committee member Orrin Hatch (R-Utah)
tried to get Holt-Baker--and other
witnesses--to commit to a particular health
care “reform” plan, but she declined.
Another witness, Felicia Fields of Ford Motor
Co., also refused to commit to a comprehensive
reform--even though she said Ford is now at a
competitive disadvantage by paying $1,000 per
vehicle to cover its workers’ and retirees’
health care. Pending court and regulatory
approval of the plan the two sides worked out,
the UAW will take over Ford retirees’ health
insurance on Jan.1, 2010, she
said.
The AFL-CIO has established a high-level
16-person committee which is evaluating all the
“reform” plans now being floated, judging
each according to the principles the federation
has laid down: Affordability, universality,
letting patients choose their own
doctors, cost controls and having the
federal government provide insurance--like
Medicare--for those who cannot get it
otherwise. ###
